I am often struck by how we are the results of random choices by our ancestors, decisions to move, to immigrate, to live one place rather than another. My parents might never have met if my grandfather had not lost his business during the 1920's and moved from one side of Vermont to another. My father would not have been living there if his parents had not decided to finally settle permanently in Vermont. His family had a history of almost 100 years of going back and forth to Canada. He was born in Canada. Recently I had my DNA tested for ethnic origin, thinking it might answer some questions. Like many genealogical answers it only provided more questions.
My limited understanding of how DNA works is that you get pieces from both parents: 1/2 from each. What pieces they pass along may differ. My profile is came out as 58% British Isles, 19% Scandinavian, 17% Southern European and 6% other. However my sibling's is 78% Scandinavian, 19% Southern European and 3% other. With an Irish mother it does seem strange that there is no British Isles DNA in her profile. Looking at the migration patterns of the Celts below it is also possible that they may have contributed to the Southern European DNA that both of us have. Viking DNA is distributed widely over Europe: Ireland and France would both have Scandinavian DNA. Irish legendary migration histories have the invaders coming to the island through what is now the Iberian peninsula.
The migration of the Celtic tribes across Europe reached the Irish isle in the period from 2000-300 B.C. These peoples probably carried DNA from what is now Austria, France, and Spain. Ireland is unique in that it was never invaded or conquered by the Romans who occupied what is today modern Britain and Scotland.
From my Dad obviously I got some British Isles, Scandinavian and Southern European - he was French Canadian and part Native American which might account for the 6% other. I wondered why it did not reflect central European DNA - which covers France. So I started to look at the history. Given the immigration statistics on the areas where his ancestors originated I found the Celts and Vikings again. Normandy and the area around Paris were Celtic strongholds. Paris, a Roman city was taken over by Frankish tribal peoples and attacked by the Vikings. There were many immigrants from La Rochelle and surrounding areas passed back and forth in the middle ages between English and French control. More British DNA perhaps? That area was also settled by the Romans - more southern European DNA? What I didn't expect was the Visigoths.
DNA opens interesting windows into the past. Its bits and pieces have been sorted and passed on from parents to children for centuries.
Do you know the male haplogroup represented in the Toulouse line? Mine is I1 Z140 - A196 and counting... Almost certainly of visigVis origin via Mendes surname via Portugal. Very interesting...
ReplyDeleteHey Hadrian built a wall to keep out the Scots lol. They did not make it up North. The Picts were too fierce.
ReplyDeleteInteresting info. Visigoths came from the swedish island of Gotland. I think you may have scandinavian dna because of that. People in Spain who are descendants from visigoths belong to I haplogroup, like scandinavian people
ReplyDeleteI agree. Scandinavia does also have some R1b & R1a but majority I1. My dna also matches Visigoth remains that had the dna tested.
DeleteYes I have a few smoking guns as to the Visigoth Ancestry. Visigoths the original Blue bloods - Azure Sangre. They introduced Visigoth Law in Iberia to supplement Roman Law. After the Moors were kicked out during the Reconquista the new rulers had to be pure blood Visigoth with no Moorish Ancestry. They wanted no sympathies toward the former rulers and it was believed the Visigoths were ideal rulers
ReplyDeleteKatia I took the Living DNA test and they currently have me categorized as 12% Scandinavian. A friend from college from the middle of Sweden thought I looked Swedish I was amused to hear
ReplyDelete